International Journal of Infertility & Fetal Medicine

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2020 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

A Rare Presentation of Heterotopic Pregnancy Presenting at Different Periods in the Same Embryo Transfer Cycle

Parameswara Iyer Ramesh, Gopinathan Kannoli, Soumya Nair, Asha Anil Menon

Keywords : Artificial reproductive techniques, Embryo, Heterotopic pregnancy, Implantation potential

Citation Information : Ramesh PI, Kannoli G, Nair S, Menon AA. A Rare Presentation of Heterotopic Pregnancy Presenting at Different Periods in the Same Embryo Transfer Cycle. Int J Infertil Fetal Med 2020; 11 (3):76-78.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10016-1209

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background: Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is a rare complication of conceptions following ovarian stimulation. Its incidence is increasing with the use of assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Case description: We are reporting a rare presentation of bilateral ectopic pregnancies together with intrauterine pregnancy which resulted from the transfer of three embryos in a single fresh transfer cycle. The presentation was unique because the pregnancies presented at different times. The intrauterine pregnancy (miscarriage) and the left ectopic pregnancy (EP) presented earlier and the right EP presented late. This is possibly due to the differential implantation and growth potential of the three embryos obtained from a single ART cycle. The patient had to undergo laparoscopy twice in a gap of 12 days. Conclusion: A high index of suspicion will help to decrease the consequences of HP, especially in ART cycles. Elective single embryo transfer would be the best preventive measure. Clinical significance: An early diagnosis of HP will help to prevent the dilemmas associated with it. Meticulous sonography and careful inspection of the contralateral tube should be the dictum in cases of HP.


PDF Share
  1. Rojansky N, Schenker JG. Heterotopic pregnancy and assisted reproduction - an update. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13(7):594. DOI: 10.1007/BF02066615.
  2. Alptekin H, Dal Y. Heterotopic pregnancy following IVF-ET: successful treatment with salpingostomy under spinal anesthesia and continuation of intrauterine twin pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;289(4):911–914. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-3099-y.
  3. Luo X, Lim CED, Huang C, et al. Heterotopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: 12 cases report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;280(2):325–329. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-008-0910-2.
  4. Seeber BE, Barnhart KT. Suspected ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107(2 Pt 1):399. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000198632.15229.be.
  5. Barrenetxea G, Barinaga-Rementeria L, Lopez de Larruzea A, et al. Heterotopic pregnancy: two cases and a comparative review. Fertil Steril 2007;87(2):417.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.085.
  6. Sherman SJ, Werne RM, Hussain M. Bilateral ectopic gestations. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991;35(3):255–257. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(91)90295-G.
  7. Goldstein JS, Ratts VS, Philpott T, et al. Risk of surgery after use of potassium chloride for treatment of tubal heterotopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107(2 Pt 2):506. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000175145.23512.5e.
  8. Liu M, Zhang X, Geng L, et al. Risk factors and early predictors for heterotopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization. Sun Q-Y, ed. Plos ONE 2015;10(10):e0139146.
  9. Jeon JH, Hwang YI, Shin IH, et al. The risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of 48 cases of heterotopic pregnancy from a single center. J Korean Med Sci 2016;31(7):1094. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.7.1094.
  10. Tummon IS, Whitmore NA, Daniel SA, et al. Transferring more embryos increases risk of heterotopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1994;61(6):1065–1067. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56757-0.
  11. Verhulst G, Camus M, Bollen N, et al. Analysis of the risk factors with regard to the occurrence of ectopic pregnancy after medically assisted procreation. Hum Reprod 1993;8(8):1284–1287. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138242.
  12. Marcus SF, Macnamee M, Brinsden P. Heterotopic pregnancies after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1995;10(5):1232–1236. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136125.
  13. Ishihara O, Kuwahara A, Saitoh H. Frozen-thawed blastoc transfer reduces ectopic pregnancy risk: an analysis of single embryo transfer cycles in Japan. Fertil Steril 2011;95(6):1966–1969. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.015.
  14. Li Z, Sullivan EA, Chapman M, et al. Risk of ectopic pregnancy lowest with transfer of single frozen blastocyst. Hum Reprod 2015;30(9):2048–2054. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev168.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.