International Journal of Infertility & Fetal Medicine

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2024 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Fresh vs Frozen Embryo Transfer in Terms of Early Pregnancy Outcome

Deepti Shrivastava, Minakshi Pounikar, Priyal Shrivastava

Keywords : Assisted reproduction technique, Early pregnancy loss, Fresh embryo transfer, Thawed embryos

Citation Information : Shrivastava D, Pounikar M, Shrivastava P. Comparison of Fresh vs Frozen Embryo Transfer in Terms of Early Pregnancy Outcome. Int J Infertil Fetal Med 2024; 15 (1):58-61.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10016-1339

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 29-02-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aims and background: Recently, storing all embryos has become a new dictum of improving the overall success of in vitro fertilization (IVF); however, contradictory data is found in the literature, especially about its impact on early loss of pregnancy in comparison to the practice of fresh transfer of embryos. In this study, we tried to analyze early pregnancy loss as a primary outcome along with total live births as a secondary outcome among selected women undergoing fresh and frozen embryo transfer (FET). Materials and methods: In this prospective observational study, 60 consecutive women seeking IVF treatment for fresh/FET were recruited. Within group I, fresh, and in group II, FET was done. The main outcome parameter was early pregnancy loss. Student's t-test was implemented, and calculation was done using the p-value. Results: In group I, early pregnancy loss was 10%, out of which 3.3% were chemical pregnancies, 3.33% were missed abortions, 3.3% were complete abortions, and live births were 33.3%. In group 2, 30% could not continue till 20 weeks. Around 6.66% were chemical pregnancies, 3.33% had blighted ovum, 6.66% with no cardiac activity, 3.33% missed abortion at 7–9 weeks, 3.33% at >9–11 weeks, and 6.66% second-trimester abortions. Live births achieved were 43.3%. Conclusion: Fresh embryo transfer is associated with a lower miscarriage rate (MR), that is, 10%, but a lesser live birth rate (LBR), that is, 33.3%, than frozen-thawed embryo transfer, where it is 30% and 43.3%, respectively. Clinical significance: On the basis of this study, it can be stated that early pregnancy losses are more in frozen cycles against fresh transfer; however, statistically, the difference is nonsignificant.


PDF Share
  1. Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2013;99(1):156–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003
  2. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril 2011;96(2):344–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050
  3. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders. Fertil Steril 2011;96(2):516–518. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.059
  4. Devroey P, Bourgain C, Macklon NS, et al. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and endometrial receptivity. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2004;15(2):84–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2004.01.009
  5. Bourgain C, Devroey P. The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod Update 2003;9(6):515–522. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmg045
  6. Richter KS, Shipley SK, McVearry I, et al. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos. Fertil Steril 2006;86(4):862–866. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02
  7. Vinsonneau L, Labrosse J, Porcu-Buisson G, et al. Impact of endometrial preparation on early pregnancy loss and live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer: a large multicenter cohort study (14421 frozen cycles). Hum Reprod Open 2022;2022(2):hoac007. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac007
  8. Hatoum I, Bellon L, Swierkowski N, et al. Disparities in reproductive outcomes according to the endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer: the risk of early pregnancy loss in frozen embryo transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018;35(3):425–429. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1078-0
  9. vonVersen-Höynck F, Conrad KP, Baker VL. Which protocol for frozen-thawed embryo transfer is associated with the best outcomes for the mother and baby? Fertil Steril 2021;115(4):886–887. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.042
  10. Litzky JF, Boulet SL, Esfandiari N, et al. Effect of frozen/thawed embryo transfer on birthweight, macrosomia, and low birthweight rates in us singleton infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218(4):433.e1–433.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.223
  11. Shi W, Xue X, Zhang S, et al. Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2012;97(6):1338–1342. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051
  12. Veleva Z, Orava M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, et al. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2013;28(9):2425–2431. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det251
  13. Belva F, Henriet S, Van den Abbeel E, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 2008;23(10):2227–2238. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den254
  14. Aflatoonian A, Mansoori Moghaddam F, Mashayekhy M, et al. Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010;27(12):695–700. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-010-9470-z
  15. Basirat Z, Adib Rad H, Esmailzadeh S, et al. Comparison of pregnancy rate between fresh embryo transfers and frozen-thawed embryo transfers following ICSI treatment. Iran J Reprod Med 2016;14(1):39–46. PMID: 27141547.
  16. Sha T, Yin X, Cheng W, et al. Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. 2018;109(2):330–342.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.019
  17. Shuai J, Chen QL, Chen WH, et al. Early spontaneous abortion in fresh- and frozen-embryo transfers: an analysis of over 35,000 transfer cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022;13:875798. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.875798
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.